If your child has an elevated lead level and you live in an older New York City apartment, a NYC lead paint lawyer can tell you whether your landlord was responsible and what a claim can do for your child. These are premises liability cases, and New York City law gives families more protection here than in almost any other kind of building condition claim.
Lead poisoning is not treated after the fact the way a broken bone is. What a claim provides is funding for the evaluation, therapy, tutoring, and support a child may need for years, and accountability from an owner who was required to prevent this. Korman Lynch Lustig & Sassower handles these cases and knows which records prove them. Below are the questions parents ask our lead paint attorneys most.
Call us at (212) 732-4992 24/7 to arrange to speak with a personal injury lawyer about your case, or contact us through our website today.
You may have a case if your child was exposed to lead in a rental apartment and the owner failed to meet obligations the law places on them. You do not need to prove your child ate paint chips, and you do not need to have complained in writing beforehand, though a complaint helps.
The central facts are usually the age of the building, whether a child under six lived there, the condition of the paint, and what the owner did or did not do about it. Our lead paint lawyers review those facts at no cost.
Owners of older multiple dwellings carry specific, ongoing duties where young children live, and cases are built on which one was skipped:
An owner who never asked about children, never inspected, and only acted after a child tested positive has failed the requirements that exist precisely to prevent that outcome.
This is the part parents almost never know. In older New York City multiple dwellings, peeling or deteriorated paint in an apartment where a young child lives is presumed to be lead based paint. Your family does not carry the initial burden of proving what was in the paint.
That presumption changes these cases. It means the argument shifts to the owner, who has to come forward with proof that the paint was not lead or that the hazard was properly addressed. Combined with the annual inspection and notice requirements, it is why lead cases with good records are among the strongest building condition claims in the city.
Yes, and the year matters. The strongest protections apply to multiple dwellings built before 1960, where the presumption and the inspection duties are at their broadest. Buildings constructed between 1960 and the late 1970s can also be covered where the owner knows lead paint is present.
Age is a starting point rather than the whole answer. Where a building falls outside those categories, an ordinary negligence claim can still exist if the owner knew about a lead hazard and did nothing, and exposure from unsafe renovation work is its own claim regardless of the building's age.
Dust matters more than chips. Most childhood lead exposure comes from invisible dust rather than from a child eating paint, which is why the condition of windows and the way repairs were performed are so central.
Lead affects the developing brain, and the damage is generally not reversible. Public health authorities have lowered the level of concern repeatedly over the years and treat no amount of lead in a child's blood as safe.
The effects show up over time rather than immediately: difficulty with attention and impulse control, slower language development, learning problems and reading difficulty, lower measured cognitive ability, and behavior challenges at home and school. Younger children absorb more and are affected more. Many families first connect the dots years later, when a child is struggling in school and someone finally looks back at an old lead test.
Usually the building owner, and often more than one party. Claims can run against the owner and any prior owner during the exposure period, the managing agent, a contractor who performed unsafe renovation work, and a public agency where the apartment is public housing.
The same obligations apply, but the deadline does not. A claim against the Housing Authority or another public agency generally requires a formal notice of claim within about ninety days, with a shortened period to sue after that, as explained on our municipal liability page.
Because lead exposure is discovered gradually rather than on a single date, the timing questions in public housing cases are genuinely complicated. That is a reason to ask early rather than to assume the answer either way.
Through records that already exist. Our lead paint lawyers gather the health department's environmental investigation and any testing performed in the apartment, your child's complete blood lead history, housing violation histories for the building and the specific unit, the owner's repair and work order records, the annual notice and inspection documentation the owner is required to keep and often cannot produce, complaints made by your family and by other tenants, permits and contractor records for any renovation, and the building's ownership history during the exposure period.
The damages side is proven separately, and it is where these cases are made. That means developmental and neuropsychological evaluation, school records including any special education services, and testimony about what a child's abilities and trajectory would have been.
Longer than in most cases, because the injured person is a child. New York extends the time for a child's own claim well past the ordinary three years, subject to limits, and toxic exposure claims carry their own timing rules tied to discovery.
Two cautions. A parent's separate claim for expenses runs on the ordinary adult clock, and a claim involving public housing carries the ninety day notice requirement. Families who assume they waited too long are frequently wrong, and it costs nothing to find out.
A settlement for a child requires court approval, which protects the money and holds it for the child. In lead cases the recovery is frequently structured so funds are available as a child moves through school and into adulthood.
No. Our lead paint lawyers handle these cases on a contingency fee basis, which means there is no fee unless there is a recovery. The first consultation is free and carries no obligation.
Korman Lynch Lustig & Sassower carries the case so you can focus on your child. Our lead paint lawyers:
Our lead paint lawyers prepare every case as if it will be tried, because that is what makes an owner and its insurer take a child's future seriously. A settlement on the right number is welcome. A settlement that leaves a child's needs unfunded is not one this firm accepts because it comes early.
If your child tested positive for lead in an older apartment, the records that prove what the owner knew and did are available now. The consultation is free, and Korman Lynch Lustig & Sassower does not get paid unless you do.
Call us at (212) 732-4992 24/7 to arrange to speak with a personal injury lawyer about your case, or contact us through our website today.
Attorney Advertising | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.